Process automation & integrations
Moving data between systems by hand costs time and creates errors. We connect your tools through interfaces so information arrives where it is needed on its own. Recurring tasks then run without anyone starting them.
When this is worth it
If you recognise yourself in any of these, a conversation is worth having.
- Somebody in your company regularly moves data from one system into another.
- The same file gets exported, reshaped and reimported every month.
- Two departments maintain the same information twice, and it does not match.
- A process stalls whenever one particular person is on holiday.
What you get
- Analysis of the processes that actually cost time
- Interfaces between your existing systems
- Automated workflows with logging and error alerts
- Handover with documentation, not a black-box script
Also part of this
Process & automation analysis
We map your processes, put a number on what eats time and calculate which automation pays for itself.
Interfaces & APIs
Your systems exchange data on their own instead of someone retyping it. With data sync, error handling and monitoring.
What drives the price
Every project has a fixed price, which you receive after the free initial consultation. These four points decide how high it is.
-
Number of systems involved
Connecting two systems is manageable. At five the effort does not grow linearly, because each additional link also complicates error handling.
-
Existing interfaces
Where a system has a documented interface, connecting it is routine. Without one we need detours via file exchange or database access, and that costs more.
-
What should happen on failure
A process that simply stops on a problem is cheap. One that detects it, reports it, partially rolls back and resumes cleanly on the next run is the real effort.
-
Data volume and frequency
A nightly run over a hundred records is a different matter from a continuous transfer every few seconds.
Process automation & integrations: frequently asked questions
By three signs: the task repeats, it follows fixed rules, and it annoys somebody. The third is meant seriously, because tasks people find dull are exactly the ones with the most slips. Do the rough sum: effort per run times how often per year. Two hours a month reshaping an export file is three working days a year. We look at your processes in the first conversation and name the ones most worth doing.
Then there is usually still a way, just a more involved one. Common routes are file exchange through a fixed location, direct database access agreed with the vendor, or reading the regular export function. What we avoid are approaches that remote-control a piece of software’s interface, because those break with every update. If no workable route exists, we say so before quoting rather than discovering it mid-project.
You find out, immediately. Every process logs what it handled and reports errors by email to an address you nominate. More importantly, a failed run leaves no half-transferred data but rolls back to the last clean state. The next run catches up on what was missed. A silent failure, where nobody notices for months that nothing is running, is the failure mode we design out.
For simple chains, yes, and then that is exactly what we recommend. Drag-and-drop automation tools reach their limits when data volumes grow and per-task billing gets expensive, when a system has no ready-made connector, or when a process has so many special cases that it becomes unmaintainable in the builder. Data protection is another point: with many of these services your data passes through someone else’s servers, which can be a problem depending on the content.
Usually two to six weeks. A single connection between two systems with documented interfaces is up quickly. Several workflows, systems without an interface or data that has to be cleaned up first take longer. We start with the workflow that costs the most time today, so the automation pays off early, and add others afterwards. You receive a binding schedule together with the fixed-price quote.
Small adjustments during the project are included in the fixed price. We work in short steps and show you the current state continuously, so changes surface early rather than at the end. If a new requirement comes up that goes beyond the agreed scope, you receive a quote for it first, also at a fixed price. You decide whether it is built now or in a later stage. Nothing gets more expensive without your prior agreement.
Goes with this
These services often come up in projects like this one.
Does that sound like your project?
A free initial consultation with David Kopka in person. We work out honestly whether we are the right fit and what your project realistically costs.

David Kopka, founder of Agilido